Quoting Andreas Ramos <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > >A sentence, specifically a statement or proposition, cannot be both > >illogical > > and true (or false). As far as I know, nobody has shown this to be false, > > not > > even Plato or Andreas. Illogical utterances cannot be truth value > > candidates > > since they possess no identifiable truth conditions. We don't know what in > > > the > > world would count as a verification or a falsification of the statement. > > But Walter, I did show this a few days ago. The sentence was both illogical > and true. > > Check your deleted mail. Balderdash, du hast showed no such thing. You commit the errors I cite in my post on this matter of a few days ago. Repeating claims already made does not count as furthering epistemic warrant for those claims. Having dispatched all present philosophical responsibilities, I return to a very nice 18 yr. old Glenlivet, turkey, family, friends and a kidnapped snowplough driver. (Not necessarily in that order, of course.) Waiting for Christmas, Walter O. > > yrs, > andreas > www.andreas.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html