W-e-e-e-lllll, OK ...... I guess I can accept that. ...... Even though Mike failed to beg forgiveness, promise never to do it again, and offer to make a contributuion in my name to my favorite charity. On the weariness of being intimidated by intelligence, talent and learning: We don't allow such fatigues in this man's army, soldier!! Drop and give me 20 ......... valid syllogism forms!! A-A-A is one. 19 more. Sgt. Okshevsky Special Philosophy Unit Canadian SEALS Quoting Mike Geary <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > WO: > > As for Mike G, he persists in illicit exaggeration and gross > > over-generalization. Neither is a philosophical virtue. I have never > > written - > > never mind "often written" - that which Mike attributes to me. Our List > > archives will attest to that. > > > > Nor do I wish to be thought of as one who expresses such judgements about > > others > > in such a manner. It's a simple matter of self-respect. Mike has at times > > expressed forlorn views on philosophical matters, and at times I called > > him on > > them. Mike should pay greater heed in the future to the accuracy of his > > interpretations and formulations of others' views and opinions. > > > I'm pretty sure that Walter is playing here, but I'm not positive, and just > in case Walter is registering his displeasure and disapproval over remarks > I've made, I want to assure him that I have only been playing. If I stepped > > over a line of propriety within Walter's world, I want him to know that it > was not an intentional insult and certainly not out of any disrespect for > him or his profession. I was playing on Eric's triple entendre of "F'ed" > (or so I took it to be: (1) these are FALSE statements, (2) you FAIL > academically, and (3) FUCK you.) I found Eric's post very amusing. When I > > wrote: "But he's a philosopher, what the fuck does he know?" I meant -- > facetiously -- what does any highly educated person know about life or the > world -- which is not a position I subscribe to, btw, but a fairly common > one here in the South -- "educated idiots" is a term long familiar to me -- > > OK, maybe you have to live here to appreciate it. In any event, in case I > was misunderstood, or understood but found unacceptable, I offer my mea > culpa. But I won't ever apologize for my crudities. I strongly believe in > crudity. In fact, I promote it. But that's for another post. > > Also for another post -- I fully share Eric's weariness with being > intimidated over and over again by the intelligence, talent and learning on > this list. Were Eric not one of the offenders, I think we might be able to > find common cause and commisserate together. But he is one of them, so fuck > > him. So fuck you all. > > Mike Geary > "Barack Obama -- Our Dalai Lama" > Memphis > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <wokshevs@xxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 3:35 PM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: I Take Full Responsibility For Not Being the One to > > Blame [was: WOdunnit] > > > > Quoting Mike Geary <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > >> EY: > >> >>Waiting for Walter to write "F." you, and deserving it, << > >> > >> In fact, Walter has often written that as a philosopher I f'ed. But he's > > >> a > >> philosopher, what the fuck does he know? > >> > >> Mike Geary > >> Memphis > >> > >> > > > > Eric Y will be waiting quite some time for that form of crudeness from me. > > > My > > parents consistently prized good manners at and away from the dinnertable. > > > > As for Mike G, he persists in illicit exaggeration and gross > > over-generalization. Neither is a philosophical virtue. I have never > > written - > > never mind "often written" - that which Mike attributes to me. Our List > > archives will attest to that. > > > > Nor do I wish to be thought of as one who expresses such judgements about > > others > > in such a manner. It's a simple matter of self-respect. Mike has at times > > expressed forlorn views on philosophical matters, and at times I called > > him on > > them. Mike should pay greater heed in the future to the accuracy of his > > interpretations and formulations of others' views and opinions. And he > > clearly > > needs reminding that my mother continues to monitor my e-mailings. > > > > Must run, supper's ready.(Ugh, liver 'n onions!) > > > > Walter O > > St. John's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Eric Yost" <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> > >> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 3:23 PM > >> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: I Take Full Responsibility For Not Being the One > > >> to > >> > >> Blame [was: WOdunnit] > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >>F. If it weren't for us, you'd probably be speaking German today. > >> > > >> > > >> > F. (1) Without the Russians, there might not be any Europe. The USA may > >> > have had to nuke the Nazis. (2) China might occupy the space Russia > >> > occupies and so we'd probably still be speaking English, but the > >> > Europeans > >> > >> > may have been speaking Chinese. (3) Without the Russians, there would > >> > be > >> > no Russia. Without Russia, the land mass of that tectonic plate would > >> > have > >> > >> > moved differently and the regions comprising Eurasia could have > >> > separated > >> > as little islands, safe and peaceful as a kitten in a bomb shelter. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I am right to blame Walter and the Russian people for everything bad. > >> > > >> > Neither T or F. "Blame for everything" is itself not right; since the > >> > blamer cannot stand apart from the thing blamed, they have no authority > >> > upon which to base their blame. > >> > > >> > > >> > Waiting for Walter to write "F." you, and deserving it, > >> > Mr. Illogic > >> > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > >> > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > >> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html