-- Now, I would also think, inspired by comments by Wager, that it may be possible to see Humanism as a 'social construction', i.e. as a rather artificial philosophy that started in the Renaissance. In that sense, 'Analytic Philosophy' would _not_ be humanist. Why, I've studied analytic philosophy for some time (I have hardly studied anything else) and we _never_ did study the concept 'man'. [Although I did have a course called "Philosophical Anthropology" where the tutor, a German, was into anti-humanism, "Die Mensch" in the anthropobiological sense that he saw humanity as a _disease_. On the other hand, in later writings, H. P. Grice, the epitome of analytic philosophy, became a sort of humanist, when he would say that while the concept 'man' is extensional, the concept 'human' is INTENSIONAL. There is a transcendental gap between one class and the other, made by axiological means. That while it would not be immoral to kill _men_, it would be immoral to kill _humans_. Cheers, JL Buenos Aires, Argentina author of "Self-Made Man: The Historical Origins of Humanism" ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com