--- Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd like to ask again what prospects an > international force > may have in keeping the Hez infestation out of > southern > Lebanon. Forget the Lebanese army--is any > international > force capable of keeping the border areas peaceful > and healthy? > I've met some guys who worked for UNIFIL, and from what I gather the answer is no chance what so ever. Hezbollah is much more than an armed force, they run schools, hospitals, etc. UNIFIL tried to offer an alternative to Hezbollah by running clinics and so on, and some say Hezbollah got increasingly millitant exactly at the moment UNIFIL started having some success. Also it is clearly their strategy to hide behind civilians. These kind of guerilla wars stop in three ways: one guerillas win, two guerillas die, three guerillas give up and/or loose popular support. They won't win. Killing them would mean slaughtering the entire population of Southern Lebanon. Which leaves packing it in and that does not seems too likely. As for Israelis, right or wrong, to expect IDF to abstain from the conflict one sidely is not realistic. Still, I'd bet there are more than a few IDF generals cursing the politicians. The decision to invade was reportedly taken in TWO hours, which rules out any effective planning. And more importantly, if Hezbollah's goal was to make itself relevant, why grant it to them by starting an all out war? There is no evil, just stupidity. Yours, Teemu Helsinki, Finland __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html