Ceteris Paribus, Grice refers in "Method in Philosophical Psychology" to various experiments. In "METHOD IN PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY", which Grice delivered as President of the American Philosophical Association refers to the Yerkes Dodson Law. Grice was supposed to be delivering the Grand Analytic-A Priori Truth. Instead, he chose to refer to this law ("there is, or _was_ this law") of "empirical pscychology", "based on experiments". "Experiments, indeed," Grice continues, "designed to test degrees of learning compentence in rats set to run mazes under water, after varying periods of initial constraints." Grice goes on to formulate the 'law' ("if it is one") With other factors constant, degrees of learning competence are correlated with degrees of emotional stress by a function whose values form a bell curve. Grice is considering the 'form' of an empirical psychological 'law' (so-called). Another example would be from his colleague at Berkeley, Garcia. As Grice notes, Yerkes and Dodson are proposing a theory, call it Th, "from which we derive 'laws'". The laws are formulated in psychological terms already which are thus 'theoretical terms', NOT observational (contra, perhaps Popper -- or not). For each theoretical term, a correspondence "rule" is found, for the Yerkes-Dodson law successfully predicts (if not analytically) that over-learning can improve performance in states of high arousal. Since McEvoy was mentioning him (+> Garcia) and I was mentioning him (+> Grice). John Garcia (June 12, 1917 near Santa Rosa, California - October 12, 2012) was an American psychologist, most known for his research on taste aversion learning. Curiously, Garcia studied at the University of California-Berkeley where H. P. Grice (the Oxford philosopher, not the East Anglia one by the same surname) where he (again Garcia, not Grice) received his A.B., M.A., and Ph.D. degrees (Grice never received a PhD degree -- "who wants to be overqualified?"). Garcia's first postdoctoral job was with the U.S. Naval Radiological Defense Lab in San Francisco, California in 1955. While Grice was interested in 'conversational intentions', Garcia began to study the reaction of the brain to ionizing radiation in a series of experiments on laboratory animals, mainly rats. --- Garcia noticed that a rats avoided drinking water from a plastic bottle -- "only when in a radiation chamber." Garcia suspected that the rat associated the “plastic tasting” water with the sickness that radiation triggers. During the experiments, a rat was given one taste, sight, sound as a neutral stimulus. Later the (same) rat would be exposed to radiation or drugs (the unconditioned stimulus), which would make him (i.e. the male rat) sick. Through this experiment, which McEvoy judges "seminal and Popperian", Garcia discovers that if a rat became nauseated after presented with a new taste, even if the illness occurred several hours later, the rat would (or as Grice prefers, "should") avoid that taste. This, mutatis mutandis, contradicted the belief that, for conditioning to occur, the unconditioned response (in this case, sickness) must immediately follow the conditioned stimulus-to-be (the taste) -- as per standard reinforcement. Not satisfied with that, Garcia went on to discover that the (same) rat developed some sort of aversion to tastes, but not to sights or sounds. This Garcia took, in a Popperian way, to disprove the previously held theory that any perceivable stimulus (light, sound, taste, etc.) could become a conditioned stimulus for any unconditioned stimulus. Meanwhile, Grice was lecturing on implicature reinforcement (or "collapse" -- "surely to explicate that p by implicating it is analytically superfluous"). Garcia's discovery, conditioned taste aversion,[1] is considered a survival mechanism because it allows an organism to recognize foods that have previously been determined to be poisonous, hopefully allowing said organism to avoid sickness. As a result of Garcia's work, conditioned taste aversion has been called the "Garcia Effect." (vide "NAUSEA"). As a result of the Oxonian philosopher's work, a taste for implicature is called the "Grice Effect." Cheers, Speranza REFERENCES Garcia J, Kimeldorf DJ, Koelling RA. Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science 1955; 122(3160): 157-8. Grice, H. P. Logic and Conversation. Deposited at UC/Berkeley, Bancroft Library. McEvoy: "...the evidence [Dr] Garcia gathered from [a rat] ... shows they will never 'associate' stomach sickness with a flashing light nor associate an electric shock with anything [the rat has] eaten, no matter the closeness of the 'association' in terms of frequency and intensity as set out in associationist pyschology." "This tells us [a rat is] NOT 'associating' as per associationism but are following some 'theories' built into [the rat's] action programme that tell [the rat], for example, that stomach sickness will be due to something [the rat] ate. "In a striking example, Garcia showed that [a rat] nauseated when unconscious, using radiation, will wake up and no longer consume the sucrose [the rat] previously lapped up - [the rat's] inbuilt rogramme has told [the rat] to be wary of what [the rat was] last eating given the nausea that the programme has detected and that the programme works with a 'theory' that such nausea will be due to something [the rat] ate ([the rat's] programme does not have a 'theory' that anticipates the possibility of radiation)." "In [neo-C]antian terms, this programme is not analytic nor synthetic a posterori but is synthetic apriori." "However, Darwin/Popper explain why this synthetic a priori knowledge, in the form of an action programme, is conjectural rather than necessarily true, and that the programme will have evolved under the pressure of 'natural selection'." "In terms of correct understanding of how we 'learn from experience', Garcia's [rat] eat Pavlov's dogs for breakfast." "That [Garcia's Rat is] is less well known would be comparable to Darwin being less well known than Lamarck." (I have reformulated, being an empiricist, each reference by McEvoy of plural ("rats") to the "(at least one) rat" singular). Cfr. Grice on the squirrel Toby in "Method in Philosophical Psychology" and psychological association theory as analytically interesting (if "ceteris paribus"). ------ Extra. "The Yerkes-Dodson law is an empirical relationship between arousal and performance, originally developed by psychologists, Robert M. Yerkes & John Dillingham Dodson in 1908. The law dictates that performance increases with physiological or mental arousal, but only up to a point." "When levels of arousal become too high, performance decreases. The process is often illustrated graphically as a curvilinear, inverted U-shaped curve which increases and then decreases with higher levels of arousal. Research has found that different tasks require different levels of arousal for optimal performance. E.g. difficult or intellectually demanding tasks may require a lower level of arousal (to facilitate concentration), whereas tasks demanding stamina or persistence may be performed better with higher levels of arousal (to increase motivation). Because of task differences, the shape of the curve can be highly variable. For simple or well learned tasks, the relationship can be considered linear with improvements in performance as arousal increases. For complex, unfamiliar, or difficult tasks, the relationship between arousal and performance becomes inverse, with declines in performance as arousal increases. The effect of task difficulty led to the hypothesis that the Yerkes-Dodson Law can be decomposed into two distinct factors ? compare bathtub curve. The upward part of the inverted U can be thought of as the energizing effect of arousal. The downward part is caused by negative effects of arousal (or stress) on cognitive processes like attention (e.g. "tunnel vision"), memory, and problem-solving. There has been research indicating that the correlation suggested by Yerkes & Dodson exists (such as that of Broadhurst 1959, Duffy 1962, Anderson, 1988), but a cause of the correlation has not yet successfully been established (Anderson-Revelle-Lynch 1989). A 2007 review of the effects of stress glucocorticoids and human cognition revealed that memory performance vs. circulating levels of glucocorticoids does manifest an upside down U shaped curve. The authors noted the resemblance to the Yerkes-Dodson curve. E.g. long-term potentiation (the process of forming long term memories) is optimal when glucocorticoid levels are mildly elevated whereas significant decreases of LTP are observed after adrenalectomy (low GC state) or after exogenous glucocorticoid administration (high GC state). It was also revealed that "in order for a situation to induce a stress response it has to be interpreted as novel and/or unpredictable, and/or the individual must have the feeling that they do not have control over the situation. Presence of a social evaluative threat constitutes the fourth." It has also been shown that elevated levels of glucocorticoids enhanced memory for emotionally arousing events but lead more often than not to poor memory for material unrelated to the source of stress/emotional arousal. If only a few points are presented then the theory can account for most results, however, both performance and arousal are presented by single terms but they are multidimensional. Also, the theory is descriptive and not an explanatory one. The Yerkes-Dodson law predicts that over-learning can improve performance in states of high arousal. REFS. Yerkes/Dodson 1908. 'The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology & Psychology 18:459-482. Anderson, K. Impulsivity, and memory scanning: an explanation for the Yerkes-Dodson effect. Motivation & Emotion, 13. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html