[lit-ideas] Grice and Garcia on reinforcement

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 05:10:16 -0400 (EDT)

Ceteris Paribus, Grice refers in "Method in Philosophical Psychology" to  
various experiments.
 
In "METHOD IN PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY", which Grice delivered  as
President of the American Philosophical Association refers to the Yerkes  
Dodson Law. 
 
Grice was supposed to be delivering the Grand Analytic-A Priori Truth.  
Instead, he chose to refer to this law
("there is, or _was_ this  law") of "empirical pscychology", "based on 
experiments".
 
"Experiments, indeed," Grice continues, "designed to test degrees of  
learning compentence in rats set to run mazes under water, after varying 
periods  
of initial constraints."
 
Grice goes on to formulate the 'law' ("if it is one")

With other factors constant, degrees of learning competence are  correlated 
with
degrees of emotional stress by a function whose values  form
a bell curve.
 
Grice is considering the 'form' of an empirical
psychological 'law'  (so-called). Another example would be from his 
colleague at Berkeley,  Garcia.
 
 
As Grice notes, Yerkes and Dodson are proposing a theory, call it Th,  
"from which we derive 'laws'".
 
 
The laws are formulated in psychological terms already which are
thus  'theoretical terms', NOT observational (contra, perhaps Popper -- or 
not).
 
For each theoretical term, a correspondence "rule" is found, for the  
Yerkes-Dodson law successfully predicts (if not analytically) that  
over-learning 
can improve performance in states of high arousal.
 
Since McEvoy was mentioning him (+> Garcia) and I was mentioning him  (+> 
Grice).
 
John Garcia (June 12, 1917 near Santa Rosa, California - October 12, 2012)  
was an American psychologist, most known for his research on taste aversion 
 learning. 
 
Curiously, Garcia studied at the University of California-Berkeley where H. 
 P. Grice (the Oxford philosopher, not the East Anglia one by the same  
surname) where he (again Garcia, not Grice) received his A.B., M.A., and  Ph.D. 
degrees (Grice never received a PhD degree -- "who wants to be  
overqualified?").
 
Garcia's first postdoctoral job was with the U.S. Naval Radiological  
Defense Lab in San Francisco, California in 1955.
 
While Grice was interested in 'conversational intentions', Garcia began to  
study the reaction of the brain to ionizing radiation in a series of 
experiments  on laboratory animals, mainly rats. 
 
---
 
Garcia noticed that a rats avoided drinking water from a plastic bottle --  
"only when in a radiation chamber."
 
Garcia suspected that the rat associated the “plastic tasting” water 
with the sickness that radiation triggers.
 
During the experiments, a rat was given one taste, sight, sound as a  
neutral stimulus. 
 
Later the (same) rat would be exposed to radiation or drugs (the  
unconditioned stimulus), which would make him (i.e. the male rat) sick. 
 
Through this experiment, which McEvoy judges "seminal and  Popperian", 
Garcia discovers that if a rat became nauseated after presented  with a new 
taste, even if the illness occurred several hours later, the rat  would (or as 
Grice prefers, "should") avoid that taste. 
 
This, mutatis mutandis, contradicted the belief that, for conditioning to  
occur, the unconditioned response (in this case, sickness) must immediately  
follow the conditioned stimulus-to-be (the taste) -- as per standard  
reinforcement.
 
Not satisfied with that, Garcia went on to discover that the (same) rat  
developed some sort of aversion to tastes, but not to sights or sounds.
 
This Garcia took, in a Popperian way, to disprove the previously held  
theory that any perceivable stimulus (light, sound, taste, etc.) could become a 
 
conditioned stimulus for any unconditioned stimulus.
 
Meanwhile, Grice was lecturing on implicature reinforcement (or "collapse"  
-- "surely to explicate that p by implicating it is analytically  
superfluous").
 
Garcia's discovery, conditioned taste aversion,[1] is considered a survival 
 mechanism because it allows an organism to recognize foods that have 
previously  been determined to be poisonous, hopefully allowing said organism 
to 
avoid  sickness.
 
As a result of Garcia's work, conditioned taste aversion has been called  
the "Garcia Effect." (vide "NAUSEA").
 
As a result of the Oxonian philosopher's work, a taste for implicature is  
called the "Grice Effect."
 
 
 
Cheers,
 
Speranza
 
REFERENCES
 
Garcia J, Kimeldorf DJ, Koelling RA. Conditioned aversion to saccharin  
resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science 1955; 122(3160):  157-8.
Grice, H. P. Logic and Conversation. Deposited at UC/Berkeley, Bancroft  
Library.
 
McEvoy:
 
"...the evidence [Dr] Garcia gathered from [a rat] 
... shows they will never 'associate' stomach sickness with 
a flashing light nor associate an electric shock with 
anything [the rat has] eaten, no matter the closeness of 
the 'association' in terms of frequency and intensity 
as set out in associationist pyschology."
 
"This tells us [a rat is] NOT 'associating' as per
 associationism but are following some 'theories' 
built into [the rat's] action programme that tell [the rat], for 
example, that stomach sickness will be due to
 something [the rat] ate. 
 
"In a striking example, Garcia showed that [a rat] nauseated when  
unconscious, using radiation, will wake up and no longer consume the sucrose  
[the 
rat] previously lapped up - [the rat's] inbuilt rogramme has  told [the rat] 
to be wary of what [the rat was] last eating given  the nausea that the 
programme has detected and that the programme works with a  'theory' that such 
nausea will be due to something [the rat] ate ([the  rat's] programme does 
not have a 'theory' that anticipates the possibility of  radiation)."
 
"In  [neo-C]antian terms, this programme is not analytic nor synthetic  a 
posterori but is synthetic apriori."
 
"However, Darwin/Popper explain why this synthetic a priori knowledge, in  
the form of an action programme, is conjectural rather than necessarily 
true,  and that the programme will have evolved under the pressure of 'natural  
selection'."
 
"In terms of correct understanding of how we 'learn from experience',  
Garcia's [rat] eat Pavlov's dogs for breakfast."
 
"That [Garcia's Rat is] is less well known would be comparable to  Darwin 
being less well known than Lamarck."

(I have reformulated, being an empiricist, each reference by McEvoy of  
plural ("rats") to the "(at least one) rat" singular). 
 
Cfr. Grice on the squirrel Toby in "Method in Philosophical Psychology" and 
 psychological association theory as analytically interesting (if "ceteris  
paribus").
 
------
 
Extra.
 
"The Yerkes-Dodson law is an
empirical relationship between
arousal  and performance,
originally developed by psychologists,
 
Robert M. Yerkes
 
&
 
John Dillingham Dodson
 
in 1908. The law dictates that
performance increases  with
physiological or mental arousal,
but only up to a point."
 
"When levels of arousal become too high, performance decreases.  The
process is often illustrated graphically as a curvilinear,  inverted
U-shaped curve which increases and then decreases with higher levels  of
arousal. Research has found that different tasks require  different
levels of arousal for optimal performance. E.g. difficult  or
intellectually demanding tasks may require a lower level of arousal  (to
facilitate concentration), whereas tasks demanding stamina  or
persistence may be performed better with higher levels of arousal  (to
increase motivation). Because of task differences, the shape of  the
curve can be highly variable. For simple or well learned tasks,  the
relationship can be considered linear with improvements in  performance
as arousal increases. For complex, unfamiliar, or difficult  tasks, the
relationship between arousal and performance becomes inverse,  with
declines in performance as arousal increases. The effect of  task
difficulty led to the hypothesis that the Yerkes-Dodson Law can  be
decomposed into two distinct factors ? compare bathtub curve.  The
upward part of the inverted U can be thought of as the  energizing
effect of arousal. The downward part is caused by negative effects  of
arousal (or stress) on cognitive processes like attention (e.g.  "tunnel
vision"), memory, and problem-solving. There has been  research
indicating that the correlation suggested by Yerkes & Dodson  exists
(such as that of Broadhurst 1959, Duffy 1962, Anderson, 1988), but  a
cause of the correlation has not yet successfully been  established
(Anderson-Revelle-Lynch 1989). A 2007 review of the effects of  stress
glucocorticoids and human cognition revealed that memory  performance
vs. circulating levels of glucocorticoids does manifest an upside  down
U shaped curve. The authors noted the resemblance to the  Yerkes-Dodson
curve. E.g. long-term potentiation (the process of forming long  term
memories) is optimal when glucocorticoid levels are mildly  elevated
whereas significant decreases of LTP are observed after  adrenalectomy
(low GC state) or after exogenous glucocorticoid administration  (high
GC state). It was also revealed that "in order for a situation  to
induce a stress response it has to be interpreted as novel  and/or
unpredictable, and/or the individual must have the feeling that they  do
not have control over the situation. Presence of a social  evaluative
threat constitutes the fourth." It has also been shown that  elevated
levels of glucocorticoids enhanced memory for emotionally  arousing
events but lead more often than not to poor memory for  material
unrelated to the source of stress/emotional arousal. If only a  few
points are presented then the theory can account for most  results,
however, both performance and arousal are presented by single terms  but
they are multidimensional. Also, the theory is descriptive and not  an
explanatory one. The Yerkes-Dodson law predicts that over-learning  can
improve performance in states of high arousal.
 
REFS.
 
Yerkes/Dodson 1908. 'The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity
of  habit-formation.
Journal of Comparative Neurology & Psychology  18:459-482.
Anderson, K. Impulsivity, and memory scanning: an explanation for  the
Yerkes-Dodson effect. Motivation & Emotion, 13.




------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: