[lit-ideas] Re: Fwd: Philosophy article in NYTimes
- From: David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:15:00 -0700
On Apr 15, 2008, at 9:05 AM, wokshevs@xxxxxx wrote:
Thank you for that very nice posting on my question, Judy. I was
thinking there
was a punchline to the question as raised by .....?
Hegel, Collingwood and Gadamer Forever (but only sometimes:)
I'm missing your point. Our lists have Collingwood in common. This
(below) from Wikipedia's list of prominent intellectual historians.
Perhaps you are suggesting that those who write about ideas in the
context of their times are not only not philosophers, they are also
not historians with a "bent" for philosophy. They are something
else, intellectuals perhaps, or members of the clerisy?
David Ritchie,
student of H. Stuart Hughes
Perry Anderson
Mikhail Bakhtin
R.G Collingwood
Robert Darnton
Jacques Barzun
David Bates
Isaiah Berlin
Mark Bevir
Marc Bloch
Fernand Braudel
Ernst Cassirer
Merle Curti
Norbert Elias
Lucien Febvre
Michel Foucault
Peter Gay
Carlo Ginzburg
Anthony Grafton
Roger Griffin
H. Stuart Hughes
Russell Jacoby
Martin Jay
Tony Judt
Alan Charles Kors
Dominick LaCapra
Arthur Lovejoy
Louis Menand
Perry Miller
J. G. A. Pocock
Carl Schorske
Quentin Skinner
Fritz Stern
Hayden White
Peter Watson
Cornel West
Richard Wolin
Other related posts:
