[lit-ideas] Re: Fw: Re: [THEORIA] Bush's Lost Year
- From: Carol Kirschenbaum <carolkir@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:37:31 -0700
Andy asks, What more do you want?
ck: Start with Kerry denouncing the war in Iraq as having been A BAD IDEA
FROM THE START. Yes, he would have to admit that he voted to give this prez
power to do whatever the hell the guy wanted, and he'd have to admit that he
was misled--ie, did the wrong thing. This is what Kerry refuses to do,
however, and so he leaves us Dems, who opposed the war from the get-go (and
continue to do so) without a candidate who speaks for us.
Then I'd like Kerry to say, and believe, that his objective is to get our
troops out of Iraq asap.
Is this too much to ask of the supposed opposition candidate, or must we
choose between one guy's mismanagement of a stupid, wrongheaded war and the
other's proposed mismanagement of same? Don't even get me started on
Kerry's weak national health proposal...Or his jobs program. (What program?)
Sure I'm voting for Kerry, but hell if I don't think he needs a BIGGER kick
in the ass, not the arse, at this point! Never too late...
Optimistically, as we head into the New Year,
Carol K.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 4:46 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Fw: Re: [THEORIA] Bush's Lost Year
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carol Kirschenbaum <carolkir@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sep 23, 2004 11:14 PM
> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Fw: Re: [THEORIA] Bush's Lost Year
>
> Dowd has been writing about Bush's propaganda for nearly 4 years now.
>
> A.A. So if she hasn't made her point by now, she's nagging. It's time to
shut up.
>
>
> C.K. Some
> of us think Kerry needs a good kick in the arse from those who want him to
> win. As for the guys Kerry booted off his campaign, he stuck with Shrum,
one
> of the few people who gets hired despite having devised losing campaign
> strategies and speeches for such luminaries as Dukakis. (Does Kerry's
> unswift Swift Boat response remind you of Dukakis's low-keyed reaction to
> any devastating campaign ads pulled on him? It should. Shrum was there.)
>
>
> A.A. 40 days before the election is not the time to give anybody a kick
in the arse, especially when they've fundamentally changed their strategies.
I ask again why she didn't attack Bush the way the Guardian did, on his
facts and timelines.
>
>
>
> C.K. By the way, your criticism of the NY Times is that it's not a
propaganda
> machine.
>
>
> A.A. You mean to say they are a propaganda machine. I said they're a
conservative paper with a liberal image, which accounts for their consistent
bias against Clinton, including the vicious, unwarranted Page One attacks
from Dowd during the Clinton campaign.
>
>
>
> C.K. Some might disagree with you there, but fortunately journalism
> isn't entirely devoid of independent glimmers, here and there.
>
>
> A.A. By "independent glimmers, here and there" I assume you mean that the
NYT occasionally gets a story right.
>
>
>
> C.K. You're free
> to hate Dowd, but criticizing her for not being "helpful" to Kerry, in
> pre-election days, rather misses the point. She's not being paid to
promote
> Kerry or anyone else. Once a journalist behaves like that, unthinkingly,
> they become nothing more than PR flaks.
>
>
>
> A.A. First, I don't hate Dowd, but the NYT I do hate. She's not going to
be better than the paper she writes for. My point is that she's not being
helpful to humanity. She printed nothing that hasn't been said ad nauseum
about Kerry, and she failed to cite Bush for his flip flops, misstatements
and staggering incompetence. She's serving only herself and her "news"
paper, that sheep in wolf's clothing.
>
>
>
> C.K. In my opinion, Kerry could use a few
> loud, gutsy, critical voices within his camp.
> Carol
>
>
> A.A. Give the guy a break and just support him. They've changed
strategy. He did a blistering attack on Bush on Monday. His response to
the Allawi's tugging at heartstrings was strong. >
>
> Andy
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 6:41 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Fw: Re: [THEORIA] Bush's Lost Year
>
>
> > Carol, here's a perfect example of how utterly clueless the masses are,
> that they swallow Bush's words hook line and sinker. They vote for a
pretty
> face basically. Why didn't Dowd write something along these lines?
> >
> >
> >
> > Here's an example of Bush's propaganda:
> >
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > >The hollow world of George Bush
> >
> > >The power of positive thinking is the president's shield from reality
> >
> > >Sidney Blumenthal Thursday September 23, 2004 The Guardian
> >
> > (cut)
> >
> > >In his stump speech, which he repeats word for word across the
> > >country, Bush explains that he invaded Iraq because of "the lesson of
> > >eptember the 11th". WMD goes unmentioned; the only reason Bush offers
> > >is Saddam Hussein as an agent of terrorism. "He was a sworn enemy of
> > >the United States of America; he had ties to terrorist networks. Do
> > >you remember Abu Nidal? He's the guy that killed Leon Klinghoffer.
> > >Leon Klinghoffer was murdered because of his religion. Abu Nidal was
> > >in Baghdad, as was his organisation."
> > >
> > >The period of Leon Klinghoffer's murder in 1985 on the liner Achille
> > >Lauro (by Abu Abbas, in fact) coincided with the US courtship of
> > >Saddam, marked by the celebrated visits of then Middle East envoy
> > >Donald Rumsfeld. The US collaborated in intelligence exchanges and
> > >materially supported Saddam in his war with Iran, authorising the
> > >sale of biological agents for Saddam's laboratories, a
> > >diversification of his WMD capability
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK
> > mailto:judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
