[lit-ideas] Re: Feeling Safe isn't safe
- From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:24:06 -0500
Again more of your "everything would be what it isn't" fun and games. I assume
it makes life easier for you. In that case: Good show. Have at it. But, by
your argument, if the European sorts want Paternalism then Paternalism must be
a manifestation of what the people want -- ergo, Paternalism is another form of
Rugged Individualism much like socialism for the wealthy is the American
version. Don't worry. One day you'll put away the things of child and come to
understand.
Mike Geary
Memphis
----- Original Message -----
From: Lawrence Helm
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:34 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Feeling Safe isn't safe
You continue to mistake our government for a European sort of Paternalism
rather than a manifestation of what the people want. People wanted free land.
The government merely regulated their desire. The government never had
anything that was not the people's. You aren't able to leave your
Leftist-Pacifistic fantasy even to spend the briefest time in reality are you?
A pity.
Lawrence
Other related posts:
