[lit-ideas] FW: Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:37:30 -0500
I think ultimately it's like having an affair. The trust gets broken.
Sometimes it's irreparable, less often the relationship is stronger once
the anger is worked through. Here it's probably irreparable. That's why I
tried to get Bill to be Amago. His sense of humor is better than mine, and
he's much better read than I am. He just has no time. Be that as it may.
I gotta go watch our movie.
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Paul Stone <pas@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: 12/10/2005 7:46:10 PM
> > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
> >
> > At 07:40 PM 12/10/2005, you wrote:
> > >What for? There were no technical issues.
> >
> > Why did you use a 'male' pseudonym?
>
>
> Don't know. That was mistake, not the pseudonym. Maybe because Mike once
> said it was mano a mano talking to me, or something along those lines. I
> thought what the heck, let me see if it's true. Amago was the real me.
So
> is Irene. Everyone has different sides.
>
>
> > Why didn't you sign up as "eyore"
>
>
> I don't know what an eyore is.
>
>
>
> and then say "hey, this is Irene, Andreas
> > won't let me on the list?
>
>
> Right. And then start the game all over again of him holding my posts, me
> posting through other people. You try it and see how you like it.
>
>
>
> > Why did you continue the charade?
>
>
> See above. There was no other way to be on the list.
>
>
> > Why did you TELL us now?
>
>
> Because I thought you suspected, or at least Julie ("who on this list read
> Russian?"; "my alter ego screen name" post she wrote; Eric with his "can I
> quote you on that" in response to words I remembered using on phil lit,
> plus the "Amago program" the way Camp was; Mike's just the facts ma'am).
> Actually I'm sorry now that I did tell the truth. It's like Mike said
> about having an affair. I should have kept it to myself forever.
>
>
>
> > Did you EVER in the past couple of years after initial startup, TRY to
> > rejoin as Irene?
>
>
> No, for the reasons stated above. For Judy, M.A. Camp was not thrown off
> for substantive issues. He simply wasn't talkatiave and communicated as
> best he could. Now there are fitness tests that have to be passed. A
far
> cry from what Andreas said to Amago when he joined, that it's anything
goes
> on this list.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > p
> >
> > _________________
> > [insert pithy quote here]
> > Paul Stone
> > pas@xxxxxxxx
> > Leamington, ON. Canada
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
