[lit-ideas] FW: RE: Re: [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO

  • From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "lit-ideas" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:11:52 -0400

I've been told not to cross post.

And I wondered what you were talking about.  Now I see it.  What happened is 
that I customarily delete the address in the "To" box in order to not 
accidentally send a post prematurely.  I add the address at the end (usually).  
Out of habit I clicked the lit ideas address instead of Theoria.  But that 
doesn't get you off the hook for the Ron Susskind book.  I dare you to read it. 
 As far as logic, logic sometimes turns into something that looks like 
superstition.  Sometimes it's useful, other times it's best avoided.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lawrence Helm 
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Cc: THEORIA
Sent: 7/4/2006 4:28:32 PM 
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO


I wondered why your most recent comment over on Theoria didnt make any sense 
and now I see why.  You referred to a comment you mistakenly posted on 
Lit-Ideas and then followed it up over on Theoria.  No great loss as far as I 
can see because this one goes off on an illogical tangent.  Are you the same 
person I thought logical the other day?

Lawrence




From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Andy Amago
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:35 AM
To: lit-ideas
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO

Right on cue, Lawrence dives straight into denial.   Did you read the part that 
Bush said on television right after 9/11 that they were going to be going after 
terrorist financing?  And have you read Ron Susskind's book?  Too treasonous 
for you?  Once again, BUSH HIMSELF SAID RIGHT AFTER 9/11 that they were going 
to be going after terrorist financing.  Where is the treason?  Silencing the 
press at all costs, that's what you want.  Why don't you just say so?  Read 
Susskind's book (which you are too cowardly to do) and then talk to me about 
this war, which btw your great grandchildren will be fighting, without the 
freedom of the press that you took away from them.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lawrence Helm 
To: aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 7/4/2006 2:24:26 PM 
Subject: RE: [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO

Right on cue, Irene, you want to infringe the 2nd amendment in a discussion 
about the 1st amendment protecting treasonous behavior.  Right after Larry says 
hed rather a few Americans were killed by the enemy than infringe the 1st 
amendment, you want the 2nd amendment infringed and the guns of citizens 
registered.  You imply that only the gun industry is opposed to that.  No, 
Irene, the bulk of Americans want to retain the right of self-defense and dont 
want the government or anyone else messing with that right.  How about 
registering every person who gives aid and comfort to the enemy?  -- Make them 
get a license for that  -- have them fill out questionnaires and get written 
approval before they can verbally support the enemy.

Lawrence

Other related posts:

  • » [lit-ideas] FW: RE: Re: [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO