Julie Krueger wrotr
This sort of thing is not really all that new. Several state legislatures (some at the prodding of governors) have tried to cut funding for or eliminate departments whose graduates do not 'contribute to the economy,' in favor of strengthening their STEM programs (science, technology, engineering and mathematics). Some states have tried to do away with departments like classics, philosophy, and the like at most campuses of their university systems, on the grounds that those who'd like to major in those fields should go to to the branches where they're still taught. The assumption that college freshmen know from the start what they'd like to major in is, of course, ludicrous, but the consolidation of 'unprofitable' majors is not; it's better to have one or two good departments in a field than half a dozen mediocre ones.http://htpolitics.com/2011/10/10/rick-scott-wants-to-shift-university-funding-away-from-some-majors/
http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/popup/news/2011/10/12/florida_governor_challenges_idea_of_non_stem_degrees http://www.sacbee.com/2011/10/12/3977025/knocking-anthropology-govs-daughter.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Here's some information about where science and engineering PhDs come from. (I think it's current up to 2008)
http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf08311/?govDel=USNSF_178%20-%20tab2and some remarks from the Reed from the Reed Physics Department that should but won't interest Rick Scott
http://academic.reed.edu/physics/history.html together with an account from Inside Higher Ed http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/10/12/florida_governor_challenges_idea_of_non_stem_degrees Robert Paul, promoting an Old English requirement for kindergartens