[lit-ideas] Re: FAO Phil/Here we go again

  • From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:37:34 +0700

Donal wrote:

"Phil has previously conceded that his own view is not supported by
any explicit statement by W in TLP. According to his own strictures
then, his views are not the result of any 'textual analysis'."

Nope.  What I conceded is that I was not quoting Wittgenstein.  I am
claiming that my view is supported by the text of TLP.  The supporting
part is the textual analysis I provided some time ago.

I look forward to Donal's engagement with the text of TLP.


Phil Enns
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: