Quoting Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > John McCreery wrote: > > "Could it be an individual whose behavior is not restricted by some > outside authority, the ultimate monadic individual?" > > Could be, except I find it impossible to imagine such a person. The > vast majority of our lives are constrained by outside authority, and I > think that is a good thing. We are born from certain parents, raised > by particular people, associate with these particular groups of > people, and hold those kinds of jobs. We have our particular > preferences and tastes which guide us in the clothes we wear, the food > we eat, the books we read, the music we listen to. In other words, we > are utterly historical beings. > How is it that we have this need to utter transcendental claims such as the one in Phil's final sentence, despite the local particularity of our socio-historical identities - a particularity clearly articulated in the rest of Phil's post? Walter O. MUN P.S. Please, my taste in clothes, food, pony-tails, books, forms of gouvernement, philosophical argument and music is quite cosmopolitan, and has nothing to do with "outside authority." If anybody refuses to recognize the univeralizable qualities of chow mein with black bean sauce, well ... my spade is turned. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html