In a message dated 3/3/2009 2:40:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: The most important debate is whether the South Saxons were brought in by ambitious local Brits (The Balkanisation Theory), or whether they were heroic seaborne invaders as the chronicles would have us believe. I tend towards the former interpretation, but leave room for the possibility of a landing or two. ----- What points? I collect books on the English Channel. With the Jutes it's easy because it's former Isle of Thanet (literally an island, now, in the Words of Sancho Panza, like Barataria, an island totally surrounded by land). One point is enough for a landing and an heroic past. My favourite landing picture is Watts, "Landing of Julius Caesar in Britain". Westminster. The sky looks so bright that they do note the Italian influence. And what about the Mercians. For Bedford _was_ Mercia, right? If the South Saxons were mercenaries, what about the other tribes? ---- "The other debate is one between tradition and evidence over the route the South Saxons took in their take-over. Tradition has a west-east flow of battles, whilst evidence suggests an east-west progression. I favour the evidence." Did they have a compass? I get so easily lost in the countryside that I assume the Saxons too. Or do you mean, 'roughly west-side', 'roughly east-side'. Coates has this toponymy map, but I haven't studied it in detail. And in any case, when it comes to landmarks, I'm only interested in 'sea-marks' or 'channel-marks' if you must. (Like "Long Island Sound, or the River Plate, the Channel is hardly 'sea'). When it comes to origins, I do love the story of Frisia, and Angeln. The Saxons, though, it's _obvious_ they came from Saxony. I love my plattsdeutsche. When I learned German in Buenos Aires, my professor would always correct my /sp/ into the ugly (to me) sound /shp/. I could not tell him that I was trying to go plattsdeutsche since he would give me a B-. "And if you want Romance, there's always the possibility that Arthur fought his first battle just south east of Lewes at the mouth of what is now the Glynde. You need Nennius and a stack of archaeological articles to get the context of this one. That and a measure of disbelief over the historicity of said Arthur." Yes, and Robin Hood was a Saxon, too, right? Nay, Mercian of Notts. Another one for Saxon lore is "Westward ho", right? It's all pretty confusing. Some say even that "Anglo-Saxon" is not really a compound of "Angles" plus "Saxons" but that "Anglo-" works as suffix, alla "French Canadian". Cheers, JL **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62) ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html