> >Back to my feel-free-to-have-emotions thesis. By trying to frame an > >emotional experience in intellectual terms, Paul is attacking the > >emotional significance of the religious experience. > > I'm not attacking the emotional significance of the religious experience, >I'm attacking the emotional significance of EVERYTHING. (can't wait to see >what JLS does with that negation) > > >A.A. What do you mean by Everything? You expect me to intellectualize such a concept? Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html