D. Ritchie: "Of Loeb, I am entirely innocent; I know nothing about the subject. I am a modern historian, straying sometimes towards the early modern period, but not tempted further back." C'mon. You should allow someone to _tempt_ you further back. Remember what Grice (yes, the Scots-surnamed Oxford philosopher) said about the implicature of things like "I am a Modern Historian, straying sometimes towards the Early Modern Period". -- Actually at Yale there are THREE research groups (in philosophy): ANCIENT philosophy workshop MODERN philosophy workshop EARLY MODERN philosophy workshop. ---!! So, I'm going to rewrite what Grice says: "By this I do not merely mean that between different areas of [history] there are cross-references, as when, for example one encounters in [American history] the [issue of slavery in Ancient Greece]. I mean (or hope to mean) something a good deal stronger than this, something more like the thesis that it is not possible to reach FULL UNDERSTANDING of, or high-level proficiency in any one department [of the arts and sciences] without a corresponding understanding and proficiency in the others; to the extent that when I visit an unfamiliar university [he visited Seattle a lot, and was indeed visiting professor there, but stopping at Reed on the way] and [as it] occasionally happens) I am introduced to, "Mr. Puddle, our man in [Early Modern] Philosophy, ... I am immediately confident that either Mr. Puddle is being under-described and in consequence maligned, or else Mr. Puddle is _not_ really good at his stuff. [the Study of Humanities], like virtue, is entire". ("Reply to Richards"). I know he was very Oxonian and against the 'careerism' he experienced in the USA, but I think he raises a good point. In any case, I think tempting people is boring, so I won't. I'll just say that you possibly _should_ be tempted (as "I" should be tempted into the study of Jamaican pattern-designs of church furniture). _http://www.tparents.org/Library/Unification/Books/Euth/Euth05-04.htm_ (http://www.tparents.org/Library/Unification/Books/Euth/Euth05-04.htm) The image of the ideal person in the Renaissance Age was an "all-round man of culture," whose mind and body are harmoniously developed. Erasmus' idea of the return to the original human nature was inherited by Joharm A. Comenius and Jean Jacques Rousseau. Perhaps the idea of being 'round-up' is perhaps related to the kyklos of the encyclopaedia (Note that Anglo-Saxon for kyklos and sphairos is 'the round'). Cheers, JL ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com