Somebody somewhere put it quite well. Paraphrasing: When I'm deliberating about what to do I am not trying to predict what I will do. Thus is freedom of the will a necessary condition for the very possibility of rationally choosing, deciding, inquiring, etc.. Whether finite, fallible beings such as we are *really* have free will is, as the Russians say: "Nye riba nye myasa." The question, in other words is quite otiose. Das heisst: you have to decide and we want your decision within 24 hours (and you better be right). Everything else is commentary. Cheers, Walter Quoting Ursula Stange <Ursula@xxxxxxxxxx>: > It's obvious that every philosopher lives her or his life just like all > of us, worrying, planning, excusing, praising and criticising, just as > if free will were true. There is no other way to live, after all. But it > doesn?t mean they are all believers. Perhaps life happens...just > happens. And our interior stories about what it all means come after the > fact. > > Science, ever peeling away from philosophy, experiments and observes and > measures and finds...that sometimes it seems that we move before our > brain sends the message to move...as though our brains are playing catch > up. This is spooky stuff and there are ethicists pondering what to do if > science proves there is no free will. What will happen if people stop > believing that they are choosing? Perhaps the scientists should keep it > to themselves. Perhaps no one would believe them anyway. > Ursula > shamelessly dipping into this conversation without having done the > requisite reading... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html