[lit-ideas] Re: "Describe the aroma of coffee"

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:25:04 EDT

 
 
On Tuesday, J. M. Geary addressed his class,
 
"Today we'll discuss the causal theory of perception -- as per  Aristippos".
 
"How do you spell that?"
 
"A - R - I - S - T - I - P - P - O - S"
 
Can you write that in the blackboard?
 
Board.
 
Board.
 
Sure. APISTIIIIIOS
 
Whoa??
 
Cyril Writing. In our previous meeting we were discussing so-called  
'heathen, perverted' analytic philosophy as spread by "Witters". He says, [as  
the 
teacher grabs the bilingual edition] "Unschreibe der Aroma des Koffee". Now  
we'll discuss the corpuscular theory of Locke and Boyle.
 
Boyle? As in boiling water?
 
Exactly. Corpuscules are boiled in water, boiling water. Same with coffee,  
if not chicken. I (to use Wittgenstein's term, as translated  by Anscombe) 
'describe' the aroma (smell, odor, 'taste' even) of coffee as the  "scent" (or 
quintescent", if you must)
 
How do you spell that?
 
"5th Sent"
 
"Where was I. Ah yes.  Of coffee sent through the air and not just the 
veritable air, but  ens realis itself (as distinct from other entia).  
 
So the smell is an entity?
 
Yes. The aroma of coffee is unique in  and of itself, no description needed, 
thank you. Even if I just gave you  one to tease you. You can cross that out 
in your notebooks. It was an 'unwritten  dogma'. 
 
And where does chicken come in?
 
Well, taste is the true test of the  philosopher.  Aristippos knew that. In 
Greek, 'taste' is _touch_. For  surely when you taste something literally, your 
tongue touches it. It's  different with the taste of coffee. And the smell of 
coffee. Or bleach for that  matter. And then there's the taste of chicken.
 
Chicken?
 
Some people say chickens have not taste. But that's not true.  Actually, the 
scent of chicken is what Plotinus called an 'ennead'.  For, he wrote, 
"everything tastes LIKE chicken" "Ad  gallinuculam omnia tangit".  What do frog 
legs 
taste like?  Chicken.  Gallinuculam. 
What do snakes taste like?  Chicken.   Gallinuculam.  What do fried dill 
pickles dipped  in peanut butter taste like?  Chicken.  Gallinuculam.  What 
does 
broccoli taste like? Moldy  chicken.  
 
Does that make an ennead?
 
Yes, he testified with nine essences and he concluded per omnia saecula 
saeculorum as we say in Memphis.   Here some definition 
and description, not necessarily ostensive IS necessary since all tastes 
depend on the  taste of chicken -- or "the bird" as we call it in Memphis.
 
Is that semantic narrowing?
 
No, that's semantic broadening. Surely 'fowl' meant _bird_ and  now means 
_chicken_. 'avicula' in Latin (little bird) now means chicken in  Italian, 
etcetera. On the other hand, brid, and bird is _girl_ -- but we must  leave 
that 
synecdoche for a longer day.
 
So Witters was wrong?
 
Not really. He was German, or Austrian, if you must.  What Witters really 
wanted to say, but did not  dare, was, what must everything _taste_ like 
chicken? 
 He was into a  bigger programme then of refuting Plotinus's idea of the  One.
 
 
 
 



 



**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car 
listings at AOL Autos.      
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)

Other related posts: