John McCreery wrote: "Could it be that demonstrating that the writer understands the careers of the relevant authorities and what they mean by what they say is more important than the argument per se? This is an ancient pattern in Asia." And this pattern can be found in Islamic thought as well. I agree that what I find in my student's papers draws on the Asian pattern you mention, but it is also something different. There is something of the Javanese culture of saying much without saying much, combined with generous borrowing from Wikipedia for the chaff. I think it is the Wiki stuff that puts it over the line for me since it is so obviously out of place. Sincerely, Phil Enns