In a message dated 6/7/2009 12:34:09 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, wokshevs@xxxxxx writes: Lying-promises made out of self-interest commit a practical contradiction in that 1) if everybody did it, nobody could do it ---- This touches on a similar scenario discussed by Grice. Since P. A. Stone says he doesnot need the Gricean formula I'll use a scenario of P. A. Stone and his son: P. A. Stone says to his son, "Turn off the light" (I know it did work with my father and me). The son, in an act of disobedience, does not. P. A. Stone is aware of that, therefore, instead of _learning_ the child (I use 'learn' to mean 'teach') utters: "Keep the light on!" therefore the child disobediently goes and turns it off. Grice (WOW, v -- googlebooks) asks: Could we say that when [P. A. Stone] utterered, "Keep the light on!" he meant that his addressee was to turn it off? The answer Grice gives is "yes". Mutatis mutandis, a community of counter-suggestible addressees _is_ possible; therefore perhaps O. W. may reconsider his interesting claims? Cheers, JL Speranza Buenos Aires, Argentina **************We found the real ‘Hotel California’ and the ‘Seinfeld’ diner. What will you find? Explore WhereItsAt.com. (http://www.whereitsat.com/#/music/all-spots/355/47.796964/-66.374711/2/Youve-Found-Where-Its-At?ncid=eml cntnew00000007) ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html