In the Wikipedia article on poverty - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty - we learn that The World <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank_Group> Bank defines extreme <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_poverty> poverty as living on less than US$ (PPP <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parity> ) 1 per day, and moderate poverty as less than $2 a day. It has been estimated that in 2001, 1.1 billion people had consumption levels below $1 a day and 2.7 billion lived on less than $2 a day. The proportion of the developing <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developing_world> world's population living in extreme economic poverty has fallen from 28 percent in 1990 to 21 percent in 2001. The U.S. on the other hand figures out what a nutritious diet would cost and multiplies that number by three figuring food costs as 1/3 of income. Thus 2003 HHS Poverty Guidelines Size of Family Unit 48 Contiguous States and D.C. Alaska Hawaii 1 $ 8,980 $11,210 $10,330 2 12,120 15,140 13,940 3 15,260 19,070 17,550 4 18,400 23,000 21,160 5 21,540 26,930 24,770 6 24,680 30,860 28,380 7 27,820 34,790 31,990 8 30,960 38,720 35,600 For each additional person, add 3,140 3,930 3,610 SOURCE: Federal Register, Vol. 68, No. 26, February 7, 2003, pp. 6456-6458. So if we were told that more Americans fell below the poverty level between 1990 and 2001 whereas in the third world those in extreme poverty dropped from 28% to 21% it might sound as though the U.S. is worse off than the third world countries. But the U.S. and the World Bank use different standards. The World Bank poverty level is $365 per year. The American poverty level is $8,980 per year. Europe uses a different standard still, but I couldn't get good information on it. Their standard is relative rather than absolute. You are getting poorer if the rich are getting richer - or something like that. Lawrence