speranzaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:48 PM, dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx < dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In a message dated 6/7/2014 9:31:29 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx writes: > (Leaving us, probably, with Wittgenstein and 'the ordinary language > philosophers', which is where we die of boredom.) > > This re: > > R. Paul quoting, "The University College London’s student union barred a > self-described “Nietzsche Club”". > > The problem may not be so much on Nietzsche but 'club'. Recall Boswell: > > When in 1783 Boswell was proposed by Johnson for membership in his later > club, which Boswell called “Sam’s,” Johnson coined a new word, when he > said: > > Boswell is a very clubbable man. > > In his dictionary, Johnson defines 'club' as "an assembly of good fellows, > meeting under certain conditions." > > He adds that "the Greeks, social as they were, lacked this idea of a > 'club'". > > 'clubbable' is a MODAL notion. > > So is 'unclubbable' -- such as it applied to Hawkins. > > Hawkins was described by one of the wits of the time as, “a pompous, > parsimonious, insignificant drawl,” and given the living epitaph: > > “Here lies Sir John Hawkins, without his shoes and staukins.” > > Hawkins was out of the club in less than three years, after verbally > attacking Edmund Burke one evening. > > Johnson passed the matter off, by remarking that Hawkins > > “was ‘unclubbable’ – curmudgeonly, tight-fisted and Pecksniffian.” > > ---- > > It may be argued that UCL is, also, being 'unclubbable'. > > Cheers, > > Speranza > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > -- palma, e TheKwini, KZN palma cell phone is 0762362391 *only when in Europe*: inst. J. Nicod 29 rue d'Ulm f-75005 paris france