Eric Yost wrote: "Can we have "belief" about a set of facts? Can we hold beliefs only about the interpretation of facts?" We don't usually associate beliefs with facts. If one is dealing with facts, one is in the realm of knowledge. I am not quite sure what Eric means by 'interpretation of facts'. It would be a fact that at a certain point in time and space, some water was measured to have boiled at 100 degrees Celsius. The rule that under normal conditions at sea level water boils at 100 degrees Celsius is, however, not a fact. It certainly follows from the facts but is not itself a fact. Nothing would exclude the possibility that tomorrow, under the same conditions, water in the southern hemisphere is found to boil at a slightly lower temperature. Sincerely, Phil Enns Toronto, ON ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html