[lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 23:49:27 -0500
Thanks, Bob.
Still shameless after all these years.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Paul" <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:22 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
Mike Geary wrote:
I have no idea if M. A. Camp is a real person, a
program or a joke. And I find myself not caring. I do care that we
start censoring.
Sub specie aeternitatis, I don't care what sort of entity MA Camp (Esq)
is either. But if it hadn't been for Mike's openness and (what's another
word for 'shamelessness'?) I wouldn't have gotten to know him, and by
not knowing him I'd have missed out on something substantially
worthwhile. (The same is true, of course, for a fair number of others
whom I've met on Phil Lit and its descendants.) So this is my answer to
the question I posed to Andy: if we just posted canned stuff to one
another, we'd never get to know one another in all our warts and finery.
Robert Paul
The Reed Institute
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
