Indeed. Care to define smarter? I define it as taking care to not shoot one's self in the foot. Others define smarter as deliberately shooting someone else in the foot and thinking it will never ricochet back (as into a financial crisis, CIA blowback, etc). Yet others define it as some academic ability. Academic ability is at least harmless, and sometimes it even bears fruit; for example when it's applied to microbiology and the like. Door #2 above seems the operative MO. --- On Sat, 10/11/08, Judith Evans <judith.evans001@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Judith Evans <judith.evans001@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Bug Report To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Saturday, October 11, 2008, 4:26 PM >Lest anyone think this means the rest of the world is a whole lot smarter, >it doesn't Doggone it! Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy" <mimi.erva@xxxxxxxxx> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 4:49 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Bug Report Lest anyone think this means the rest of the world is a whole lot smarter, it doesn't. They're for now more clever, superior in math and science, the way we once were. But they're as oblivious to the all important environment that keeps them alive and that they have no idea they can't live without that they're destroying it as fast as they can. Little things like they'll be out of drinking water in a couple of decades at most and top soil to grow food is way down and on and on. Instead they're building and driving cars as fast as they can get their hands on them. Speaks for itself about human intelligence don't you think? Sorry to be so negative, but it's just reality. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html