In March of 2005 Brigitte Gabriel was invited by the Political Studies department of Queens University (Canada) to give her perspective on the Middle East conflict. My son is doing PhD in history at Queens and he is my source of information. After she spoke, there was an extended discussion among the Queens' students about her ignorance of ME history, her sweeping generalizations about the evil, lazy, dishonest "Arabs" and "Muslims", and her characterization of the Israelis as the embodiment of generosity and good. Most students allowed that she had the right to frame the conflict in the context of own personal tragedy but that did not make her expert on the larger issues. According to my son, much of the discussion centered whether her opinions could be considered "hate speech". In a discussion board sponsored by the Political Studies department, a member of the group who had invited her said the following: "Having attended the speech, I will say that it was about as close to hate speech as you can get. I am a member of Hillel, who brought her to Queen's along with the Queen's Israeli Peace Initiative, and to be frank I am disappointed that the Hillel leadership did not do better research before inviting Ms. Gabriel to this campus. The saddest part of Ms. Gabriel's speech, was that having heard her recount her childhood experiences, you understand where all that hateful language comes from. I am in no way justifying what she said, but I think this is an important thing to take out of this mess. We need to realize just how prevalent this kind of raw hatred is in the middle east, from Jews, Muslims and Christians like Ms. Gabriel." My son said there was an editorial in the student paper that generated numerous letters to the editor about the speech but I couldn't find it online. Here is a link to the political studies discussion board: http://www.queensu.ca/politics/pols110a/discus/messages/346/567.html?1112978 254 Because my parents and I suffered the consequences of WW II does not, perforce, make me an expert on the issues. But it does give me a perspective through which I filter other information. In my case, I think it made me susceptible to fundamentalist Christian teachings of divine retribution against those who refuse the truth. When your childhood is spent in chaos, there is something very comforting about the vision of an angry God who fights on your side against all who oppose you. That's also my interpretation of the rhetorical appeal of militant Muslims like Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khomeini. Mix in the lust for political power and you have a lethal combination. Now that I I've and teach in the South, I see similar problems with the conflation of religious fervor and American politics. Please do not immediately assume that I think the American system is equivalent to the social vision of militant Muslims. But Jerry Falwell's vision is pretty creepy too. And here are many Americans who subscribe to that vision . From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judith Evans Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:24 AM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Brigette Gabriel again supporting Israel I link to an interview with Brigitte Gabriel, who is, of course, a Maronite Christian. I suggest people who read it check the history of the phalangists in Lebanon and relate that to the date she gives (1975). In the eighties I knew a Lebanese Christian studying here among whose main friends in the UK were non-British Muslims, in particular, one from Syria. She decided to return to the Lebanon -- because her family was there -- despite the belief that conditions there were about to worsen. They did. Her family were killed. There's much secrecy about exactly what happened next but basically, she was located, helped out of the country, and brought to safety in Syria. Here's Brigitte Gabriel: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19016 Judy Evans, Cardiff