[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
- From: Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:23:44 +0000 (GMT)
> (I just hate "hypotheticals" where the assumptions that set up the
> hypothetical are not themselves subject to the same
> logical analysis as the supposed hypothetical itself.)
Maybe you do.
But if you think your comments amount to a "logical analysis" I suggest you
are completely deluded and don't really have a grip
on the issue(s).
Donal
Btw, it is _logically impossible_ for a set of assumptions to subject
themselves to the same level of "logical analy." as the
assumptions/hypotheticals they are analysing. You are just a logical prat for
thinking otherwise.
Bored, but logical, in England.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts: