[lit-ideas] Re: Ask the Ayatollah

  • From: "Steve Chilson" <stevechilson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:11:11 +0100

(pardon the blasphemy) but is sucking your own dick to the point of
climax a violation of fasting?


On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:23:16 +0200, "Chris Bruce" <bruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
said:
> 
> On 5. Okt 2006, at 20:26, Eric Yost wrote:
> 
> > &#8230; Deliberate masturbation during the month of Ramadan renders a fast 
> > invalid, Iranian Supreme Leader Sayyid Ali Khameini has ruled.
> 
> Is the phrase 'deliberate masturbation' not pleonastic? My dictionary 
> defines 'masturbate' as follows: 'to stimulate the genital organs (of 
> oneself or another) to achieve sexual pleasure'.  (It seems to follow 
> that if one has a particular intent- i.e., 'to achieve sexual pleasure' 
> - then one's actions are deliberate.)
> 
> Other questions arise:
> 
> If one 'stimulates the genital organs of another to achieve sexual 
> pleasure (for the other)' is one's own fast rendered invalid, or that 
> of the other?   If one 'stimulates the genital organs of another to 
> achieve sexual pleasure for oneself (but not for the other)' whose fast 
> is then rendered invalid?  If one has one's sexual organs stimulated by 
> another in order to achieve sexual pleasure (whether for one or 
> another) without deliberately requesting or condoning such stimulation, 
> what then?  And what of sexual pleasure achieved without stimulation of 
> the sexual organs (of either oneself or another)?  Or are all erogenous 
> zones or fetishes by definition 'extensions' of the sexual organs? 
> (E.g., must one with a rubber fetish wash dishes during Ramadan 
> bare-handed?  And what if one has a rubber *and* a 
> soap-suds-on-naked-flesh fetish?)
> 
> Wait a minute - I get it!  Although all this questioning may be perhaps 
> intitally stimulating (in which case, there goes one's 'fast validity' 
> - fast!), the mire of semantic and clinical details ultimately turns 
> one off.  Clever fellows, those ayatollahs &#8230;.
> 
> Chris Bruce
> Kiel, Germany
> 
> DISCLAIMER: One feels obliged to assure the Lit-Ideas readership that 
> the pronouns 'one' and 'another' are here used 'impersonally' and any 
> correspondence between the contents of the above posting and the 
> activities or proclivities of actual persons, living or dead, is purely 
> coincidental (i.e., *not* deliberate).
> 
> (One hopes that this disclaimer should leave the validitiy of a few 
> fasts intact.  On the other, er, hand, should one - or another - find 
> that not to be the case, one - or another - can be reached in the usual 
> fashion &#8230;.)
> 
> CB
> --
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
-- 
  Steve Chilson
  stevechilson@xxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: