Just posted the following on bestoftheblogs. Thought some here might =20 be interested. <b>What we gonna do when the smart folks don't wanna live here no =20 more?</b> <a href=3D"http://www.alternet.org/story/22104/";>Alternet</a> is now =20 featuring a Lakshimi Chaudry interview with Richard Florida, author =20 of <i>The Flight of the Creative Class:The New Global Competition for =20= Talent</i>. Florida's previous book <i>Rise of the Creative Class</i> =20= got a lot of play because of its thesis that the information economy =20 runs on creative talent and creative talent congregates in places =20 where diversity, tolerance and a vibrant cultural life are prized =20 (good news for the Blue States, not so good for the Red; good news =20 for San Francisco, not so good for Cincinnati, let alone Crawford, =20 Texas). Now Florida has extended his argument, noting what's likely to happen =20= to the USA when smart folks worldwide decide they'd rather be =20 somewhere else, a natural consequence of the USA's growing reputation =20= abroad as a religion and security-crazed international bully that =20 makes life tough for folks who don't toe the religious right's line. =20 Thus, says the Chaudry interview's lead, > an isolated and hostile post-9/11 America may find itself on the =20 > losing end of the global competition for the ultimate economic =20 > prize: creative talent. What Josh Hammond may particularly like is Florida's take on Tom =20 Friedman's <I>The World is Flat</i>. > The point that I want to make is that the world is not flat. The =20 > world is even more concentrated, uneven, and unequal than it has =20 > ever been. The world, in fact, is really "spiky." What Friedman is =20 > doing is looking out from the top of the Empire State Building and =20 > seeing only Silicon Valley, Bangalore, Shanghai-- all these =20 > outposts of the creative age right now. That's what the world looks =20= > like if one looked at it in terms of decentralizing and =20 > disaggregating forces. > > But if one looks at the very powerful concentrating forces, the =20 > forces of unevenness and inequality, one sees the world where only =20 > 25 to 50 places really matter. And if you're outside those 25 to 50 =20= > places, if you're a kid in India, who's not in Bangalore, if you're =20= > growing up in Arkansas or Alabama, things are very different. =20 > What's happening is that those creative centers are sucking up all =20 > the talent from the hinterland. The critical point for the US economy is that, increasingly, those 25 =20= to 50 places will be outside the United States, in Asia for those who =20= like the rough and tumble of economies taking off or old Europe for =20 those who like=81\what was that again?=81\tolerance, diversity and a =20 vibrant cultural life. Clearly, as one critic responding on the Alternet blog points out, =20 Florida's thesis is far from the whole story. The brute economic =20 reality that very smart and ambitious people can be employed in =20 places like China or India for a 10th the cost of hiring similar =20 people in the USA cannot be ignored. Thus, even the culturally cool =20 places in the USA may suffer, regardless of their appeal in contrast =20 to the uncool center of the country. That said, the issue may no longer be, "How can you keep the boy on =20 the farm after he's seen Paree?" But "Who needs San Francisco, let =20 alone Dubuque, when Shanghai is hopping?" John McCreery= ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html