[lit-ideas] Administration of Secrecy

  • From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:22:48 EST

 
_http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060221/pl_nm/security_archives_dc;_ylt=AoUHFQAxy
vKSOpPo20OkSsYDW7oF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl_ 
(http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060221/pl_nm/security_archives_dc;_ylt=AoUHFQAxyvKSOpPo20OkSsYDW7oF
;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl)  
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. intelligence agencies have been secretly removing 
 from public access at the National Archives thousands of historical 
documents  that were available for years, The New York Times reported on 
Monday.  
The restoration of classified status to more than 55,000  previously 
declassified pages began in 1999, when the   _CIA_ 
(http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news/?p=CIA)  and five other agencies 
objected to  what they saw as a hasty 
release of sensitive information after a 1995  declassification order signed 
by President   _Bill Clinton_ 
(http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news/?p=Bill+Clinton) , the Times said on 
its Web  site.
The secret program accelerated after the Bush administration took office and  
especially after the September 11 attacks, according to archives records, the 
 paper said. 
It came to light after intelligence historian Matthew Aid noticed dozens of  
documents he had copied years ago had been withdrawn from the archives' open  
shelves, the Times said. 
Under existing guidelines, government documents are supposed to be  
declassified after 25 years unless there is a particular reason to keep them  
secret. 
Some historians say the program is removing material that can do no  
conceivable harm to national security and note that some of the documents have  
been 
published by the government, the Times said. 
Critics say it is part of a marked trend toward greater secrecy under the  
Bush administration, which has increased the pace of classifying documents,  
slowed declassification and discouraged the release of some material under the  
Freedom of Information Act, the paper said.

Other related posts: