on 4/12/05 10:38 AM, JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx at JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx wrote: I am intrigued by "fish with bananas". My > sis-in-law from the DR occasionally cooked fried platanos which were > surprisingly > good, as I dislike bananas as a general rule, but here in the Midwest, fish > and > bananas are ....... just...... they don't keep company...... care to > elaborate? I do love curry, if that helps. It is often the most innocent-seeming questions that cause the greatest trouble. Wanting to check my facts before responding, I went to my trusty thirteenth Britannica and was briefly lost among the "b"s: "Bandana," is a word, probably derived from the Portuguese and from the Hindustani. It refers to what we call "tie-died" cloth. George Bancroft, the famous American historian, pleaded the American case in the San Juan Islands boundary dispute. "Banate" is another name for "Bannock," perhaps the most feared native Americans in Oregon. What I wanted to check was the number of species of banana and their world-wide uses. I do recommend the article I read, thick with facts, this for example, "It would require abut eighty bananas of average size to yield the amount of energy required daily, and about double that number to yield the necessary amount of proteid [sic]. Hence the undue abdominal development of those who live mainly on this article of diet." This takes a little of the shine off my bright manuscript idea, "Lose weight in thirty days eating fish and bananas." The bananas we generally eat are varieties of Musa Sapientum, a sub-species of Musa Paradisiaca. Sapientum fruit can be eaten raw; Paradisiaca, Acuminata, Fehi, Cavendishii (the so-called Chinese banana) all require cooking. They vary in size greatly. One fruit from another species, Musa Corniculata, Britannica's essayist reports, "affords an adequate meal for three men." Now we come to memory and the tricks it plays. I'm told that when I was asked as a child what my favorite meal might be, I replied with a reasonable combination of my two favorite foods: "bananas and chips" (freedom fries). Perhaps this is why I combined bananas with fish. But in law school, Mr. Henderson, the guy who taught Tort, wanted us to pay greater attention to the reasoning in the case than to its outcome, so he would conclude his exposition, "And the answer's a banana." (I think sometimes he swapped in other fruit, but I'm pretty sure "banana" was his favorite). So perhaps I combined bananas with fish out of some reverence for his memory. In Hawaii the case was simple. We were either staying in a condo where bananas could be harvested from the porch--one memory--or had bought a bunch (in the English and in the American senses) from a roadside stand. One way or another, at the end of the holiday we had a surplus of the stubby little type. We also had found a source of good, fresh tuna. Pairing the two in my mind, I concluded that they might taste well together, and so that is what I served, the tuna very lightly cooked, the bananas merely heated, fresh lime squeezed over the whole. Last weekend I had some perch that had been frozen at sea, a flesh not quite as meaty as tuna but not in an altogether different category either. By different category I mean fish like cod and plaice and catfish, which I can't imagine combining well with bananas. Perch, on the other hand, seemed possible. And so I tried the combination, heating butter and curry powder in a pan, pouring that combination into a classic French cream sauce--shallots and parsely and butter, a little white wine and cream--and then cooking the perch in that first pan's residues. I did nothing to the bananas other than cut them. I let people serve themselves, buffet-style, adding banana and sauce if they wished, none if they thought the notion too weird. David Ritchie Portland, Oregon ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html