[Linux-Discussion] Re: [Fwd: network problems using RayLink wireless and Linux 2.4 firewall]
- From: Carol Horwitz <chorwitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: linux-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:05:34 -0500
Done. The firewall now has 192.168.1.1 as ihostWireless and 192.168.0.1
as ihostLan. The laptop (bigbird) is 192.168.1.3, both on the Windows
and Linux OS. The desktop (Windows98, wired) is 192.168.0.2. Everything
works (or not, as the case may be) as before. No more or less.The routes
on the firewall now are:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
66.69.80.0 * 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default 66.69.80.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
ifconfig gives:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:29:46:C2:66
inet addr:66.69.86.2 Bcast:255.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.240.0
UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:6712 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:726 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:23 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:1108767 (1.0 Mb) TX bytes:91508 (89.3 Kb)
Interrupt:9 Base address:0xf880
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:C6:E7:2B:7C
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1110 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1269 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:116557 (113.8 Kb) TX bytes:782544 (764.2 Kb)
Interrupt:5 Base address:0xf400
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:F1:11:1C:11
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:480 (480.0 b)
Interrupt:3
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:116 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:116 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:8120 (7.9 Kb) TX bytes:8120 (7.9 Kb)
Is it possible that the pcmcia card is using a different interrupt on
the Windows and Linux side and that makes a difference? I'm not sure I'd
even know where to look.
cdh
Paul Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Carol Horwitz wrote:
>
>
>>The "spaghetti" reference is definitely true, but remember that this
>>very same inelegant structure works when I use the laptop under Windows
>>2000.
>>
>>
> It shouldn't:)
>
>
>>I'd like to clean this up anyway, and see if it can possibly help. I
>>assume you mean that I should have two subnets, one for the "wired"
>>portion of my home network and one for the "wireless" portion.
>>
>>
> Precisely.
>
>
>>I don't
>>know what the subnet mask would be for the 192.168.1.0 portion.
>>
>>
> 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.0.0 would both have a netmask of 255.255.255.0.
>
>
>>Also, do
>>I map different hostnames to the different IPs on my firewall, one for
>>the wired side and one for the wireless?
>>
>>
> Should do the trick.
>
>
>
> ---
> Paul Anderson
> geeky1!paul
> "Nature has been kinder to us than we had any right to expect.
> --- Freeman Dyson
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
