[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: order of operations in parser
- From: Ken Perry <kperry@xxxxxxx>
- To: "liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:13:13 +0000
Thanks I was planning on re doing all the af stuff but that will be a good
start.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mesar Hameed
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 4:30 PM
To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: order of operations in parser
Hi Ken,
In the en-us-g2.ctb, I suggest to remove the sufword after rule, and have it
separately as a word opcode, and then treat special case words containing after
as either noback begword or just list them out as words.
Its just an idea, hopefully it will lessen the list of errors.
Mesar
On Mon 21/10/13,18:31, Ken Perry wrote:
>
>
> John, does the word operation get acted on first or the other rules?
> I think the word operation should happen first. For example I have a
> rule
>
> Word aft 1-124-2345
>
> But it still back translates as
> Aftert
>
>
> If the word rules were ran first this would not happen ever would it?
>
> Ken
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Other related posts:
