Hi Ken, In the en-us-g2.ctb, I suggest to remove the sufword after rule, and have it separately as a word opcode, and then treat special case words containing after as either noback begword or just list them out as words. Its just an idea, hopefully it will lessen the list of errors. Mesar On Mon 21/10/13,18:31, Ken Perry wrote: > > > John, does the word operation get acted on first or the other rules? I > think the word operation should happen first. For example I have a rule > > Word aft 1-124-2345 > > But it still back translates as > Aftert > > > If the word rules were ran first this would not happen ever would it? > > Ken
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
