[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: liblouisxml-1.9.0: linking fixup
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:36:51 +0100
Hello,
Christian Egli, le Fri 13 Mar 2009 13:48:11 +0100, a écrit :
> > > So what is wrong with it?
> >
> > Makefile.am uses BASE_DEPENDENCIES_LDFLAGS, while Makefile.in defines
> > BASE_DEPENDENCIES_LIBS.
>
> Unfortunately I don't quite understand this part of the Makefile (which
> seems to deal with building static libs) well enough to grok what you
> are talking about. Would you mind sending a patch for this change?
Here it is.
> BTW I'm very exited about your intent to package liblouis and
> liblouisxml for Debian
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513632 and
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513633). If there is
> anything I can do to move this forward, please let me know.
The packages are in the NEW queue already
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
so we just have to wait for ftpmaster's checks.
Samuel
Index: liblouisxml/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- liblouisxml/Makefile.am (révision 58)
+++ liblouisxml/Makefile.am (copie de travail)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
-version-info \
$(LIBLOUISXML_CURRENT):$(LIBLOUISXML_REVISION):$(LIBLOUISXML_AGE) \
-no-undefined \
- $(BASE_DEPENDENCIES_LDFLAGS)
+ $(BASE_DEPENDENCIES_LIBS)
liblouisxml_la_SOURCES = \
change_table.c \
Other related posts:
