I think there is some confusion of terms here. We seem to be saying UTF-8 when we mean escape sequences. John On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:15:55PM +0100, Mesar Hameed wrote: > On Fri 08/06/12,14:01, Michael Whapples wrote: > > I believe it might be that the encoding of the file should be UTF-8. > > Therefore if it is encoded using something like latin1 and contains a > > character above 128 it will need to be re-encoded into UTF-8. > > Yes, exactly. > > > May be I have got it wrong, using escape sequences have the advantage they > > can be typed easily regardless of keyboard layout, but they can > > make it harder to read (I am split on that one as to which I prefer). > > liblouis commands should all be in ascii at the moment, so those beyond 127 > should be represented with \xABCD. > The file itself should be utf-8 encoded, so that names, comments etc can be > written in a natural way. > These two statements are distinctly different and we need to make sure table > writers dont confuse the matter, which seems to have happend with > the broken tables. > > Thanks, > Mesar > For a description of the software, to download it and links to > project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com