Can somebody give a current status on the current UEB merging? Is it still
issues with numeric mode?
MRG
mgray@xxxxxxx
________________________________________
From: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Arend Arends
[mada73bg@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 5:02 AM
To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: UEB Regressions
Correction: It is probably not the disclaimer itself but the signature or
the last part of the signature that causes the problem. The signature is
also unreadable to me (with Windows Live Mail).
Arend Arends
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
From: Arend Arends
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:48 AM
To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: UEB Regressions
It seems that in the replies by Davy Kager a disclaimer is added that causes
the mail to be sent with Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64.
Apparently some mail programs cannot read this.
This stays until someone replies with the last part of the original message
removed.
Arend Arends
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
From: Steve Jacobson
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:11 PM
To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: UEB Regressions
Greg,
I am getting the same thing but it seems to be only for certain people,
Michael Gray and Davy Kager most recently. Your message came through fine.
I thought I probably had a setting wrong or something.
Best regards,
Steve Jacobson
-----Original Message-----
From: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Kearney
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 9:57 AM
To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: UEB Regressions
Something is amiss with the list server. All I am getting is empty messages.
Greg
On Mar 22, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Davy Kager <DavyKager@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: