Hi On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:34 +0000, Michael Whapples wrote: > I could see some use to that, my main concern would be as xml2brl is a > document processing tool getting the correct output might be harder than > for liblouis. What I mean is that some of the layout may be able to > differ and still be valid. Hm, I'm not sure I follow that. Given an input file and a set of configurations, shouldn't you always get the same output? > I think it would need suggestions on how to > use it, eg. should I do a translation with xml2brl and hand correct the > output file to create the test output? I would presume so. A good example is the mail you sent earlier in this thread[1]: You specify an input file and you say that the output should contain this-and-that (instead of what xml2brl delivered). If we had the output as it was supposed to be then we could use this to automatically test xml2brl. Thanks Christian [1] //www.freelists.org/post/liblouis-liblouisxml/Problems-with-liblouisxml -- Christian Egli Swiss Library for the Blind and Visually Impaired Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland For a description of the software and to download it go to http://www.jjb-software.com