Hi,
You're right, it is not documented, probably because it was never intended
to be used like that.
If possible you should try to avoid defining a character twice with
different dot patterns, but it's OK if there is no other choice (there are
some valid use cases, as long as it is done in a controlled way).
I'm not too sure what the order of processing is. I believe the first
definition wins, but don't take my word for it. You can easily test this
yourself though.
This issue is also relevant: https://github.com/liblouis/liblouis/issues/384.
It shows that there is probably an inconsistency when capsletter is in use.
So be careful, back your table with enough tests.
2017-09-21 17:51 GMT+02:00 Michael Whapples <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
The LibLouis documentation is slightly unclear on this one.
If in a table there are two character definition opcodes for one
character, which one will be applied?
The reason I want to do this is that in the table I am working on we
probably can reuse another table in the main, but a few characters may need
redefining. Would I need to define these differences first before including
the existing table or do I do the include first.
Regards
Michael Whapples
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://liblouis.org
