I'm unsure how that could be the case as most of these tables simply extend UEB to cover a handful of unique letters in those languages. Are the UEB tables failing? Sent from my iPhone Greg Kearney > On Aug 27, 2014, at 4:28 AM, Mesar Hameed <mesar.hameed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > Another thing to highlight is that you only provided tests for one of > the tables. > The tests that you provided all fail, are you aware of this? > > thanks, > Mesar >> On Wed 27/08/14,12:48, Christian Egli wrote: >> Hi Greg >> >> I'm trying to get your tables merged for the release next Monday. Everything >> seems more or less OK now (https://github.com/liblouis/liblouis/pull/9). >> There are even some tests. However there is one thing I'd like to clarify >> before I can merge. You provided 6 tables and of those 3 are licensed under >> the GPL and 3 are licensed with LGPL. Is this on purpose or is this an >> ovesight? I'm not sure we can accept tables under the GPL. Can we have all >> of them with LGPL2+? >> >> Thanks >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Egli >> Swiss Library for the Blind, Visually Impaired and Print Disabled >> Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland >> >> For a description of the software, to download it and links to >> project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com