On 10/11/2009 9:06 AM, Michael Whapples wrote:
Yes, it does. However, there could theoretically be multiple "unified" codes; e.g. NUBS (although it isn't officially ratified yet as far as I know). As I noted, the "extra" part specifies the code name if there is more than one.You're right about the last one (en-unified-g1-UEBC.utb) looking a bit odd. My first comment (possibly incorrect not knowing fully about UEBC) doesn't it duplicate information, doesn't the UEBC part say its unified Braille for English?
It possibly raises the argument that file names are not enough. As I understand it the UEBC table would apply to more than one country (eg. Austraillia and Canada), so can apply to more than one locale.
True enough.Even if file names aren't used, I still think we need to clean up the current file naming mess. Perhaps they shouldn't be named by locale, but rather, by code name; e.g. en-ebae-g1.utb.
Jamie -- James Teh Email/MSN Messenger/Jabber: jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx Web site: http://www.jantrid.net/ For a description of the software and to download it go to http://www.jjb-software.com