Yes. Well, the benefit of this is that the same prefixes could be used for
regular and multipass rules. But on the other hand I think nofor/noback is
equally clear and the benefit of sticking with that, for regular rules, is
that we wouldn't have to do unnecessary changes of the table format.
2017-01-10 13:08 GMT+01:00 Dave Mielke <dave@xxxxxxxxx>:
[quoted lines by Bert Frees on 2017/01/10 at 13:02 +0100]
You could also have prefixes onlyfor/onlyback which more or less comesdown to
the same thing. Is that what you had in mind?
Yes, that's simple and allows tables to be clear.
--
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of
God.
Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario | http://Mielke.cc/bible/
EMail: Dave@xxxxxxxxx | Canada K2A 1H7 | http://FamilyRadio.org/
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://liblouis.org