On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Richard Ward wrote: > On Jun 2, 2011, at 12:03 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Jun 1, 2011, at 10:24 PM, tedgrant@xxxxxxx wrote: >> >>> One can ask quite reasonably, "why pay $7000.00 for a Leica when whatever >>> the price is for a Fuji X100 that produces and records images as sharp and >>> crisp as this? Is it not a reasonable question? >> >> >> If we were to compare 16x20 prints; >> or the need to do some serious crop an image; >> or lens interchangeability; >> or dynamic range; >> or… >> well not really comparable. > > The M9 does win on those points. If you need 16x20s, serious cropability, or > changeable lenses, and especially if you want your camera bag not to weigh 20 > or 30 pounds - the M9 is practically incomparable. > > But what if the Question was limited to whether the X100 and an M9 were > equally suitable for getting images like this one of Tikwa? > > I think questions about Suitability really muddy the clarity of choosing an > M9 when there are a number of fine and interesting camera options available > to choose from. > > Particularly so when Physical Print sharing is receiving such fierce > competition from Electronic Image sharing. > >> Though your question certainly has relevance >> if your main interest is a medium wide focal length camera >> and the end result intended is 72ppi screen and/or 8x10 prints. >> Then - sure - why spend $7k when you can meet your intentions for $1.2 > > As a gateway camera/drug ;-) to an M like paradigm, I find the x100 wunderbar. > If the Leica X2 plays in the same playground, Leica might be able to pay even > more dividends to stockholders. the Fuji X100 offers no real competition to the M9 and its stable of lenses. It is however an extremely likeable and sophisticated P & S that is capable of wonderfully, incredibly detailed and subtle images that have strong appeal to people who have knowledge and taste. Looking and feeling like a rangfinder it has the uncanny ability to produce pictures that will blow you away, and it can do this even when set to fully automatic and autofocus mode.... Steve . > > R. > > >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george@xxxxxxxxxxx >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> >> >> >> >> ------ >> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: >> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ >> Archives are at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/