[LRflex] Re: returning to 35mm
- From: "Gary Pinkerton" <gpinkcp@xxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:07:00 -0600
I agree;for me the smaller R bodies are much more prone to shake than the SL
series or the R8/9.
This goes for handheld, or on a tripod [which I use with the R8s a lot].
----- Original Message -----
From: Douglas Herr<mailto:telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:52 PM
Subject: [LRflex] Re: returning to 35mm
On Dec 14, 2006, at 6:07 PM, LEICAFLEX wrote:
> Doug, David or anyone else, have you experienced more/less/no
> difference in camera shake with Leicaflex SL/SL2 versus R3-R9 bodies?
The SL certainly is easier to hold steady at slower speeds than the R4,
R-E and R6 (and I assume the R7 too). I'm using the R8 exclusively
with the DMR and it's much greater mass seems to help reduce camera
shake.
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com<http://www.wildlightphoto.com/>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm<http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm>
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/<//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
