Douglas, you're a wizzard, and must be a very patient one too. I've tried shooting - photographically I mean - birds in the past month and got nowhere near to what you seem to produce at every outing. Congratulations and thanks again. Phileicangenieux. PS: I need technical advice on how to reconcile poor light, high speed, and grain on slides. I'll post a couple of sorry snaps later in the week to illustrate my problems :-( Douglas Herr wrote: >I've been wary of taking my camera kayaking because of the typical >proximity to large volumes of water, so I've been looking for a setup >that would represent a much smaller financial loss if the kayak should >transmogrify into a submarine, yet still deliver good results. > >I recently bought (via some auction site) a Novoflex 400mm f/5.6 >T-Noflexar, complete with accessory bellows (BAL-U) for extreme >close-ups, accessory tripod collar and Nikon mount for the princely sum >of US$125. For those who are unfamiliar with the Novoflex follow-focus >lenses, they were very popular among pre-AF wildlife photographers for >their good optical performance and quick focussing action. The >Novoflex lenses focus through a squeeze grip (google Novoflex images >for a look-see); the action is quick and accurate, the down side being >hand fatigue, weight and a limited focussing range (focussing range can >be easily extended with the BAL-U bellows or the variable extesnion >tube built into later models). > >I tested the setup today on dry land with the DMR (in the Kayak I'll >use a battered SL instead): > >http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/trochilidae/anhu03.html > >whaddya think? > >Doug Herr >Birdman of Sacramento >http://www.wildlightphoto.com > >------ >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm >Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/