[LRflex] Re: Zeiss 50

From: "W.B. Abbott" <captbilly3@xxxxxxxxx>
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:50:29 -0700

Hi Reg,

Thanks for sharing your Zeiss experience. I appreciate having the information 
and I am confident others do too.

All the best,

Bill

On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:00 AM, info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hi everyone, my first post for a long time.
> 
> I have Zeiss 50 1.4 and Nikon 50 F1.4 for my F3HP.  Also Pentax 50 1.4 for
> K10d.
> 
> Have 50 f2 summicron R on my R3.
> 
> All are excellent at 5.6.  Summicron is the best wide open,  Zeiss and Nikon
> a tiny fraction less sharp but minimal difference, wide open both are a
> little soft on corners, Pentax more so but acceptable.
> 
> Of all lenses I would choose the Zeiss as colour rendition is superb and
> always seems to produce fabulous images.  I also have 85 Zeiss on F3HP and
> isa stunning lens.
> 
> I have no explanation as to why other users have found Zeiss soft at greater
> than 5.6, but then again I have a Leica zoom that is very poor, a waste of
> $600 on eBay.
> 
> That's all folks!   Have a wonderful day everyone.
> 
> Reg 
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

References:
- [LRflex] Zeiss 50
  - From: info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[LRflex] Re: Zeiss 50

Other related posts: