[LRflex] Re: Z + N = ? OT (maybe)
- From: Richard Ward <ilovaussiesheps@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:25:23 -0400
George,
I have to admit I forgot to include the gazillion cameras NiCanTax et al
produce(d) that aren't their most expensive 'premium' cameras. You're spot on
point, you,re correct, and we ARE on the same page on something after all.
:-)
R.
____________________________________
Sent From An M8 User.... :-)
____________________________________
On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:41 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 3:47 PM, Richard Ward wrote:
>
>> At best, they could be generously described as having shot for 'brightness'
>> over usability for focusing!
>
> sorry Richard but again I see the movement
> as their having shot for 'dimness'.
>
> we'll get back on the same page
> over something - I'm sure ;~)
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
