G''Mornin' Richard!
I suspect you are right. Planned obsolescence has great value, even for
Rolls-Royce!
David.
My baseless guess is Leica has found out there's greater retail sales value
in putting a new number after the M (M3-M5-M6-M8-M9) than there is in just
having the M always hanging there all alone. That's my guess anyways.
Sincerely,
Richard.
________________________________
What would men be without women?
Scarce, sir, mighty scarce.
- Mark Twain
________________________________
On Dec 3, 2016, at 12:14 AM, David Young <dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some time ago, Leica announced that they would no longer have "numbers"
after the "M" ... but rather all new Leica's would be Leica "M"s, with a
Type number to indicate which style it was.
So, why is it that Mirrorless Rumours, and other sites are saying "Leica M10
will be announced in mid January." In the case of the M-10, it is a type
3656.
Does anyone know about the change, and why? Was labeling them all as "M"s
a marketing flop? Curious minds want to know!
David.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
?//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
