[LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke question on M
- From: "Miha Golobic" <miha.golobic@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:50:03 +0100
Why complicate with adapters when new SL3 full frame digital will be
available this December for 1000 bucks ;-)))
Miha
2008/11/28 Chris L <speleo_karst@xxxxxxxxx>
> 3003 Cartridge: Yes! I've thought and dreamed about it.
>
> Maybe one day, if I find a trashed full-frame DSLR, I could recover the
> sensor and the electronics, though I doubt I have good enough technical
> skills....
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx>
> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 7:24:35 PM
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke
> question on M
>
> Aha! we dream the same dreams!! :-)
>
> And would a digital back for the 3003 go down well, too?
>
> Sadly never to be- at least not unless I win the jackpot of the national
> lottery, then I'll take a taxi and a briefcase full of cash to
> Braunschweig and ask what the new Franke and Heidecke boffins can do.
>
> Douglas
>
> Chris L wrote:
> > How about any Rolleiflex to M adapters?
> >
> > That would get me an 18mm and an M-Fisheye! :-)
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx>
> > To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 5:27:50 PM
> > Subject: [LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke
> question on M
> >
> > The only M alternatives are Leica and Zeiss, which cost you an arm and a
> leg (bothe legs in the case of Leica) and a couple of Vogtländers that cost
> 5 to 10 times the price of an adapter.
> >
> > If you can find one, get a Yashica 3.5/21 it is a fantastic lens (as is
> their 2.8/55 Macro, but that's another story, I don't think scale focussing
> accuracy would be too good with it on an M) and a C/Y to Leica-M adapter -
> come to think of it, that's a cheap way of getting the excellent CZ 1.4/50
> and the glorious bokeh of the 1.4/85 on a Leica M, too. :-)
> >
> > I think I'll forget the R to M adapter and go for the C/Y to M.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Douglas
> >
> > red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> >> I stand corrected.... on a Visoflex, focus is for close ups only... for
> an M body, infinity focus is preserved.
> >>
> >> Brings up an ineresting cost issue for a 21 Leica lens on an M body.....
> R lenses
> >>
> >> Frank
> >>
> >>
> >> ------
> >> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> >> Archives are at:
> >> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > ------
> > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> > Archives are at:
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------
> > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> > Archives are at:
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >
> >
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
Other related posts:
