[LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke question on M

  • From: "Miha Golobic" <miha.golobic@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:29:24 +0100

No prob Philippe, chrome or black?

Miha




2008/11/28 Philippe AMARD <philippe.amard@xxxxxxxx>

> Get me two Miha, it'll help me wait for the R 9.2 Diesel ;-)
> Phx
>
>
>
> Miha Golobic wrote:
>
> Why complicate with adapters when new SL3 full frame digital will be
> available this December for 1000 bucks  ;-)))
>
> Miha
>
> 2008/11/28 Chris L <speleo_karst@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>> 3003 Cartridge:  Yes!  I've thought and dreamed about it.
>>
>> Maybe one day, if I find a trashed full-frame DSLR, I could recover the
>> sensor and the electronics, though I doubt I have good enough technical
>> skills....
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx>
>> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>  Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 7:24:35 PM
>> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke
>> question on M
>>
>> Aha! we dream the same dreams!! :-)
>>
>> And would a digital back for the 3003 go down well, too?
>>
>> Sadly never to be- at least not unless I win the jackpot of the national
>> lottery, then I'll take a taxi and a briefcase full of cash to
>> Braunschweig and ask what the new Franke and Heidecke boffins can do.
>>
>> Douglas
>>
>> Chris L wrote:
>> > How about any Rolleiflex to M adapters?
>> >
>> > That would get me an 18mm and an M-Fisheye!  :-)
>> >
>> > Chris
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----
>> > From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx>
>> > To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 5:27:50 PM
>> > Subject: [LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double
>> stroke question on M
>> >
>> > The only M alternatives are Leica and Zeiss, which cost you an arm and a
>> leg (bothe legs in the case of Leica) and a couple of Vogtländers that cost
>> 5 to 10 times the price of an adapter.
>> >
>> > If you can find one, get a Yashica 3.5/21 it is a fantastic lens (as is
>> their 2.8/55 Macro, but that's another story, I don't think scale focussing
>> accuracy would be too good with it on an M) and a C/Y to Leica-M adapter -
>> come to think of it, that's a cheap way of getting the excellent CZ 1.4/50
>> and the glorious bokeh of the 1.4/85 on a Leica M, too. :-)
>> >
>> > I think I'll forget the R to M adapter and go for the C/Y to M.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Douglas
>> >
>> > red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >
>> >> I stand corrected.... on a Visoflex, focus is for close ups only... for
>> an M body, infinity focus is preserved.
>> >>
>> >> Brings up an ineresting cost issue for a 21 Leica lens on an M
>> body..... R lenses
>> >>
>> >> Frank
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------
>> >> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> >>    http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> >> Archives are at:
>> >>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > ------
>> > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> >  http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> > Archives are at:
>> >  //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ------
>> > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> >    http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> > Archives are at:
>> >    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>> >
>> >
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>  http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> Archives are at:
>>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> Archives are at:
>>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
>
>

Other related posts: